First, if I say no problem and I am one of the initiators of the manifesto for the suspension of pre-election agreement with ICV. As some insist on calling Stalinist heavy, I will try to respond without yellow llamr fuck anyone who is in IU (while still thinking that some of them share the same policy that Mohamed VI, the pedophile drug kingpin.) Some say
[ 1 , 2] we intend to blow up an agreement already taken, wonderful to the left. Leaving aside the wonderful thing that may or may not be. First, that agreement reached, the organ of IU has ratified the agreement, or perhaps have you gripping the membership by referendum telepathic? Or a postal referendum, and I have not received my letter?. So what is by now a preliminary agreement is not final. In any case what is called the manifest not vote, but will be suspended until the Joan Saura do something about the burden of Block Gossos against my colleagues in the UB. And if it is called blackmail, the same ICV management did in the primaries UI [3 ] when they said that if their candidate did not win no pact with IU. And I and many others see in this blackmail the only way to clean a bit Mordor Sauron (which as someone has said Barrett started not coming to the Guardia Civil and you know as I [ comment # 1 vid 30]).
out there insist that no one publicly opposed the agreement [1 ], well I did here [ 4] and organic everywhere I've had the opportunity and I will continue to uphold in my view if this is a subject of discussion. Not that it is contrary to the basis of an agreement with ICV. I think simply that there are levels and levels of agreement, ie, the real political differences increase (or in many cases the opposite as in the PP and PSOE) as they are rising levels locally is very easy to reach agreements and take a common political program, a European level where what is at issue is macro and systemic, sometimes it is simply impossible. Thus a few months ago in this blog I made inquiries concerning European policy ICV, and only Aimei [5 ] was kind enough to answer, So if sometimes with a really not and I am not informed. And is that these questions are part of what some call a nostalgic Program, Program, Program. If you obtained a satisfactory answer to all questions would have no problem supporting the agreement with ICV. Of course it would not hurt to have chosen the full application UI (so that European elections are not personal) and the coalition decided in a referendum so we keep quiet a bit.
And last and most pessimistic in tone, every day and once I read or hear some comments, or see some practices I wonder if IU is still worthwhile.
[ 1 , 2] we intend to blow up an agreement already taken, wonderful to the left. Leaving aside the wonderful thing that may or may not be. First, that agreement reached, the organ of IU has ratified the agreement, or perhaps have you gripping the membership by referendum telepathic? Or a postal referendum, and I have not received my letter?. So what is by now a preliminary agreement is not final. In any case what is called the manifest not vote, but will be suspended until the Joan Saura do something about the burden of Block Gossos against my colleagues in the UB. And if it is called blackmail, the same ICV management did in the primaries UI [3 ] when they said that if their candidate did not win no pact with IU. And I and many others see in this blackmail the only way to clean a bit Mordor Sauron (which as someone has said Barrett started not coming to the Guardia Civil and you know as I [ comment # 1 vid 30]).
out there insist that no one publicly opposed the agreement [1 ], well I did here [ 4] and organic everywhere I've had the opportunity and I will continue to uphold in my view if this is a subject of discussion. Not that it is contrary to the basis of an agreement with ICV. I think simply that there are levels and levels of agreement, ie, the real political differences increase (or in many cases the opposite as in the PP and PSOE) as they are rising levels locally is very easy to reach agreements and take a common political program, a European level where what is at issue is macro and systemic, sometimes it is simply impossible. Thus a few months ago in this blog I made inquiries concerning European policy ICV, and only Aimei [5 ] was kind enough to answer, So if sometimes with a really not and I am not informed. And is that these questions are part of what some call a nostalgic Program, Program, Program. If you obtained a satisfactory answer to all questions would have no problem supporting the agreement with ICV. Of course it would not hurt to have chosen the full application UI (so that European elections are not personal) and the coalition decided in a referendum so we keep quiet a bit.
And last and most pessimistic in tone, every day and once I read or hear some comments, or see some practices I wonder if IU is still worthwhile.
0 comments:
Post a Comment